Who Was Osborne Reynolds?
by David E. Schwartz
In my research I came across the work of
Osborne Reynolds, a 19th century English
physicist and engineer whose area of interest was
"turbulence" (fluid mechanics). In 1883 Reynolds, by
experimenting with pipes of varying sizes, was able to come up
with a number, (now known as the "Reynolds number")
that tells engineers when a fluid system will reach turbulence.
The Reynolds number is calculated by
multiplying together several variables including the diameter of
the pipe, the velocity of flow, the mass of the fluid, and the
fluids viscosity. Reynolds showed that when that magic
number is reached, the flow through the pipe becomes turbulent
(i.e. becomes erratic).
So, what does this have to do with horse
racing? Plenty. Especially if you are a modeler. Suppose you
are modeling 6 furlong races at Hollywood Park for 3
factors
The Model
|
EP
|
SP
|
Class
|
race 1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
race 2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
race 3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
race 4
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
race 5
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
race 6
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
race 7
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
race 8
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
Sum
|
17
|
14
|
15
|
Worst
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
How would you interpret this model? This
is the kind of model that one would call "loose." There
is no single factor that can be used to eliminate down to a
playable number of horses, though when we sum the columns we can
come up with "something."
Lets create some "Reynolds
number" columns for each 2-factor combination. Thus, the
EPxSP for race 4 is 12 because 3 x 4 =12 (i.e. EP x SP = EPxSP).
The
Model
|
EP
|
SP
|
Class
|
EPxSP
|
EPxCl
|
SPxCL
|
race 1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
race 2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
3
|
race 3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
race 4
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
12
|
3
|
4
|
race 5
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
2
|
3
|
race 6
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
race 7
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
race 8
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
Sum
|
17
|
14
|
15
|
31
|
26
|
22
|
Worst
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
12
|
6
|
5
|
Now when we look at the worst, it makes more
sense. SP x CL is certainly the most powerful column, as no
winner has had an SPxCL Reynolds of worse than 5! It also
explains why, if class is so important, a horse with a Class rank
of 5 could win (race 8). He made it up by having 1s in both
of the other two columns!
If we were to describe the profile of a winner
in these 8 races, we could say:
-
Must have a 4 or less in EP.
-
Must have a 4 or less in SP.
-
Must have an SPxCL of 5 or less.
-
Must have an EpxSP of 6 or less.
The Race
|
EP
|
SP
|
Class
|
EpxSP
|
EpxCl
|
SPxCl
|
Elim
|
Horse #1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
9
|
X
|
Horse #2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
|
Horse #3
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
8
|
16
|
X
|
Horse #4
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
20
|
4
|
5
|
X
|
Horse #5
|
5
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
25
|
5
|
X
|
Applying rule #1 eliminates #5, leaving: #1 #2
#3 #4 (not enough EP)
Applying rule #2 eliminates #4, leaving: #1 #2
#3 (not enough SP)
Applying rule #3 eliminates #1 & #3,
leaving: #2 (not enough SP and CL in combination)
The Reynolds number will also help when you
have a model that is a little more obvious. Lets add one
more column: EpxSPxCL.
The
Model
|
EP
|
SP
|
Class
|
EPxSP
|
EPxCl
|
SPxCL
|
EPxSPxCL
|
race 1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
race 2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
3
|
6
|
race 3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
race 4
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
12
|
3
|
4
|
12
|
race 5
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
2
|
3
|
6
|
race 6
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
race 7
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
race 8
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
Sum
|
17
|
14
|
15
|
31
|
26
|
22
|
|
Worst
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
12
|
6
|
5
|
12
|
The rules for this race are:
-
Must have 3 or less in SP
-
Must have 3 or less in CL.
-
Must have 4 or less in SPxCL.
-
Must have 8 or less in EpxSPxCL.
The
Race
|
EP
|
SP
|
Class
|
EPxSP
|
EPxCl
|
SPxCL
|
EPxSPxCL
|
Elim
|
horse #1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
horse #2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
12
|
x |
horse #3
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
8
|
16
|
32
|
x |
horse #4
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
20
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
x |
horse #5
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
15
|
25
|
15
|
75
|
x |
Once again, with conventional modeling we would
not have been able to eliminate as many horses. The first two
steps would have easily gotten us down to two, but the model
clearly says that a horse must have enough of everything (i.e.
EPxSPxCL) to qualify.
Think about that minimum in rule #4. How does a
horse get 8 or less?
1 x 1 x 1=1
|
1 x 1 x 4=4
|
1 x 2 x 3=6
|
1 x 1 x 2=2
|
1 x 2 x 2=4
|
1 x 2 x 4=8
|
1 x 1 x 3=3
|
1 x 1 x 5=5
|
2 x 2 x 2=8
|
Lets work up a set of descriptions.
-
If a horse has 2 or more 1s,
hes in.
-
If he has only a single 1, he must have no
worse than 2 x 3 in the other two slots.
-
If he has no 1s, he must be all
2s.
-
All other horses are out!
We'll revisit Osborne Reynolds and his
contributions to handicapping at a later time.
|